Abstracts & Keywords


 

Home
Aims & Scope
Editorial Board
Contents & Abstracts
Submitting Your Paper
Copyright & Permissions
Subscriptions and Orders

 

 Back Up Next

A comparative study of seismic provisions between International Building Code 2003 and Uniform Building Code 1997

Wenshen Pong1, Zu-Hsu Lee2 and Anson Lee1

  1. School of Engineering, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA

  2. Department of Management and Information Systems, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, USA

Abstract: This study focuses on the comparison of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) 1997 and International Building Code (IBC) 2003 in relation to the seismic design and analysis of special steel moment resisting frame buildings (SMRF). This paper formulates a numerical study of a steel SMRF building, studied in four different situations, namely: as an office building in San Francisco; as an office building in Sacramento; as an essential facility in San Francisco, and as an essential facility in Sacramento. The analytical results of the model buildings are then compared and analyzed taking note of any significant differences. This case study explores variations in the results obtained using the two codes, particularly the design base shear and drift ratios as they relate to different locations and occupancy use. This study also proves that IBC 2003 is more stringent for the redundancy factor under design category E for the SMRF building, and drift limits for essential facilities.

Keywords: Uniform Building Code 1997; International Building Code 2003; building periods; special moment resisting frame; redundancy factor

Back Up Next

horizontal rule

Copyright 2009 IEM. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration. All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as described below, without written permission from the Publisher. Copying of articles is not permitted except for personal and internal use, to the extent permitted by national copyright law, or under the terms of a license issued by the National Reproduction Rights Organization of China.